Eduistiqomah in Philosophy (EIP) welcomes original scholarly manuscripts that contribute substantially to philosophical inquiry and contemporary philosophical discourse. Manuscripts should demonstrate conceptual clarity, rigorous argumentation, engagement with relevant scholarship, originality, and a clearly articulated contribution to the field.
Authors are required to ensure that their manuscripts comply with the journal's focus and scope, formatting requirements, publication ethics, and peer-review procedures before submission.
Manuscripts must be submitted electronically through the journal's Open Journal Systems (OJS) platform. Submissions sent by email or other channels will not normally be considered unless specifically requested by the Editorial Office.
EIP considers the following manuscript types:
A substantial scholarly contribution presenting original philosophical arguments, interpretations, analyses, or theoretical developments.
A manuscript that develops, reconstructs, compares, or critically evaluates philosophical concepts, theories, or frameworks.
A rigorous review of philosophical literature that synthesizes existing scholarship, identifies significant debates or research gaps, and provides critical theoretical insight.
A study that critically compares philosophical traditions, thinkers, concepts, theories, or intellectual frameworks.
A study connecting philosophical inquiry with another field of knowledge while maintaining a substantive and clearly articulated philosophical dimension.
Manuscripts must be written in English using clear, precise, and academically appropriate language.
Authors who are not sufficiently confident in academic English are encouraged to have their manuscripts professionally proofread before submission.
The use of terminology from other languages is permitted when philosophically necessary. Non-English terms should be italicized where appropriate and clearly explained upon first use.
Manuscripts submitted to EIP must be original and must not have been previously published in any journal, book, conference proceeding, or other scholarly publication.
A manuscript under consideration by EIP must not simultaneously be submitted to another journal.
By submitting a manuscript, the authors confirm that:
Authors should organize their manuscripts according to the nature of the study. For original research and analytical philosophical articles, the following structure is recommended:
For conceptual, theoretical, or philosophical studies, section headings may be adapted to reflect the argumentative structure of the manuscript.
The title should be concise, informative, specific, and accurately represent the central philosophical problem or argument of the manuscript.
Authors should avoid:
The recommended title length is approximately 12–18 words, although longer titles may be accepted when necessary for precision.
The manuscript should include:
The corresponding author should be clearly identified during submission.
Authors should ensure that the information entered into OJS exactly corresponds with the information provided in the manuscript.
The abstract should provide a concise and informative overview of the manuscript.
For research articles, the abstract should generally include:
The abstract should normally contain approximately 200–250 words and should be written as a single coherent paragraph unless otherwise required by the article type.
The abstract should not contain:
Authors should provide 4–6 keywords that accurately represent the central concepts, philosophical traditions, theories, problems, or themes discussed in the manuscript.
Keywords should be specific and useful for indexing and discovery.
The introduction should establish the intellectual and philosophical context of the study and clearly identify the problem being addressed.
A strong introduction should:
Authors should avoid treating the introduction merely as a general background section. The philosophical problem and contribution should be clearly identifiable.
Manuscripts should clearly explain the philosophical approach used to develop and support their arguments.
Depending on the study, relevant approaches may include:
Authors should explain why the selected approach is appropriate for addressing the research problem.
For interdisciplinary studies, authors should clearly explain how philosophical reasoning is integrated with the relevant disciplinary approach.
The central analysis should present a coherent and logically structured philosophical argument.
Authors should:
Manuscripts should move beyond descriptive summaries of philosophers, theories, or concepts. EIP particularly values critical engagement, original interpretation, conceptual development, theoretical reconstruction, and substantive philosophical argumentation.
The literature review should be analytical rather than merely descriptive.
Authors should prioritize:
Authors should demonstrate how the manuscript relates to existing scholarship and clearly identify the contribution made by the present study.
The discussion should interpret the central argument or findings in relation to existing philosophical scholarship.
Authors should explain:
The conclusion should provide a concise synthesis of the main argument and contribution.
It should:
Tables and figures should be included only when they meaningfully support the argument.
Each table or figure should:
For predominantly philosophical manuscripts, visual materials should be used selectively and only when they contribute substantially to conceptual clarification or analysis.
Direct quotations should be used selectively and only when the original wording is important to the philosophical argument.
Short quotations should be integrated into the text using quotation marks.
Long quotations should be formatted as block quotations according to the journal's manuscript template.
Authors must provide accurate page numbers for direct quotations whenever page information is available.
All quotations must be properly attributed to their original sources.
Specialized philosophical terminology should be used consistently throughout the manuscript.
Where a concept has multiple interpretations or translations, authors should:
Greek, Latin, Arabic, or other non-English philosophical terms may be retained when they provide conceptual precision.
EIP recommends the use of the APA 7th edition citation and referencing style unless otherwise specified by the journal's current manuscript template.
Authors should ensure that:
Authors are strongly encouraged to use reference management software such as Zotero, Mendeley, or EndNote.
Authors should prioritize authoritative and academically relevant sources.
Where appropriate, the reference list should include a substantial proportion of recent peer-reviewed journal literature, while recognizing that classical philosophical works and foundational texts may necessarily be older.
Authors should avoid excessive reliance on:
The relevance and quality of references are considered as part of the editorial and peer-review process.
For studies involving philosophical thinkers or traditions, authors are encouraged to engage directly with primary texts whenever possible.
Secondary literature should complement rather than replace substantive engagement with primary philosophical sources.
Translations should identify the translator and edition where relevant.
Authors remain fully responsible for the content, accuracy, originality, and integrity of their manuscripts.
Generative artificial intelligence tools may be used for limited purposes such as language improvement, proofreading, or assisting with non-substantive editorial tasks, provided that their use does not replace the author's intellectual contribution.
AI tools must not be listed as authors.
Authors must verify all AI-assisted content, references, quotations, interpretations, and factual claims.
The use of AI tools must comply with the journal's applicable Artificial Intelligence and Generative AI Policy.
All submitted manuscripts may be screened for plagiarism and inappropriate text similarity.
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their manuscripts properly acknowledge all sources and do not reproduce the work of others without appropriate attribution.
Plagiarism includes, but is not limited to:
Manuscripts that violate academic integrity standards may be rejected or subjected to further editorial action.
Authorship should reflect substantial intellectual contribution to the manuscript.
All listed authors should have made meaningful contributions to the conception, analysis, interpretation, development, or writing of the work and should approve the final manuscript.
Individuals who do not meet authorship criteria should not be listed as authors.
Any change to authorship after submission requires justification and approval in accordance with the journal's editorial policy.
Authors must disclose any financial, institutional, professional, personal, or other relationships that could reasonably be perceived as influencing the research or its interpretation.
If no conflict exists, authors should state:
“The authors declare no conflict of interest.”
Authors should disclose all sources of financial support for the research or publication.
If the research received no specific funding, authors may state:
“This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.”
Individuals or institutions that contributed to the research but do not qualify for authorship may be acknowledged.
Authors should obtain permission from individuals before including their names in the acknowledgment section.
Where applicable, manuscripts involving human participants, sensitive data, interviews, or other ethically regulated research should provide appropriate information regarding ethical approval, informed consent, confidentiality, and data protection.
Authors are responsible for ensuring compliance with relevant institutional and ethical requirements.
Where applicable, authors are encouraged to provide sufficient information to enable readers to understand, evaluate, and reproduce the analytical procedures used in the study.
For philosophical and conceptual studies, authors should provide transparent documentation of the primary texts, sources, interpretive procedures, analytical frameworks, and conceptual reasoning used.
As a general guideline, research articles should contain approximately 5,000–8,000 words, excluding the reference list, tables, and supplementary materials.
Longer manuscripts may be considered when their length is justified by the complexity and scholarly significance of the subject.
Authors should prioritize substantive scholarly contribution over manuscript length.
Authors must follow the journal's official manuscript template for:
Manuscripts that substantially fail to comply with the required format may be returned to the authors before entering peer review.
Before submitting a manuscript, authors should ensure that:
The manuscript fits the focus and scope of EIP.
The manuscript is original and has not been published elsewhere.
The manuscript is not under consideration by another journal.
The manuscript is written in clear academic English.
The title accurately reflects the manuscript.
The abstract is complete and informative.
Appropriate keywords are provided.
The philosophical problem is clearly identified.
The theoretical or philosophical approach is clearly explained.
The central argument is logically structured.
Relevant scholarly literature has been adequately engaged.
Primary philosophical sources are used where appropriate.
All quotations and ideas are properly cited.
The reference list follows APA 7th edition.
DOI information has been included where available.
Tables and figures are properly numbered and cited.
All authors have approved the manuscript.
Author affiliations and ORCID information are complete.
Conflict of interest information is provided.
Funding information is provided where applicable.
Ethical requirements have been addressed where applicable.
AI-assisted content complies with the journal's AI policy.
The manuscript has been checked for plagiarism and inappropriate similarity.
The manuscript follows the official EIP template.
Authors submit manuscripts through the EIP OJS platform. Each submission is first evaluated by the Editorial Office for scope, originality, academic quality, ethical compliance, and adherence to the journal's submission requirements.
Manuscripts that pass the initial editorial assessment are sent for double-blind peer review. The identities of authors and reviewers are concealed during the review process.
The final editorial decision may include:
Authors are expected to respond carefully and systematically to reviewer and editor comments when revisions are requested.
Submission of a manuscript to Eduistiqomah in Philosophy (EIP) indicates that the authors have read and agreed to comply with these Author Guidelines, the journal's publication ethics, peer-review procedures, copyright and licensing provisions, and other applicable editorial policies.
The Editorial Board reserves the right to request revisions, return manuscripts that do not comply with the journal's requirements, or reject manuscripts that fail to meet the journal's scholarly and ethical standards.
SUBMIT ARTICLE
ARTICLE TEMPLATE ENGLISH
ARTICLE TEMPLATE INDONESIA
Tools
 |
 |
CITEDNESS IN SCOPUS
Contact us
INFORMATION
