Retraction and Correction

Eduistiqomah in Philosophy (EIP) is committed to maintaining the accuracy, integrity, and reliability of the scholarly record. The journal recognizes that errors or concerns may occasionally be identified after an article has been published. Appropriate corrections or retractions will therefore be issued when necessary to preserve the integrity of the academic literature.

1. Corrections

A correction may be issued when an article contains an error or omission that affects the accuracy or clarity of the published record but does not invalidate the main scholarly contribution of the article.

Corrections may include, but are not limited to:

  • Errors in author names, affiliations, or other publication metadata.
  • Typographical or factual errors.
  • Incorrect or incomplete references.
  • Errors in tables, figures, or supplementary materials.
  • Minor errors that could cause misunderstanding or misinterpretation.

Where a correction is necessary, EIP will publish a Correction Notice that clearly identifies the affected article and explains the nature of the correction. The corrected version of the article will be linked to the correction notice where appropriate.

2. Retractions

An article may be retracted when there is substantial evidence that its findings, arguments, or scholarly integrity are seriously compromised.

Reasons for retraction may include:

  • Plagiarism or substantial unattributed copying.
  • Fabrication or falsification of research or scholarly information.
  • Duplicate or redundant publication.
  • Serious errors that invalidate the main conclusions or scholarly contribution.
  • Manipulation of the peer-review process.
  • Unethical research practices.
  • Serious authorship or contribution violations.
  • Misrepresentation of sources, quotations, or references.
  • Undisclosed conflicts of interest that materially affect the article.
  • Other forms of serious academic or publication misconduct.

Retraction decisions are made by the Editorial Board after appropriate assessment of the available evidence.

3. Retraction Notice

When an article is retracted, EIP will publish a Retraction Notice that:

  • Clearly identifies the retracted article.
  • States the reason for the retraction.
  • Identifies the parties responsible for the retraction where appropriate.
  • Remains permanently accessible.
  • Is linked to the original article.
  • Clearly indicates the retracted status of the article.

The original article will normally remain accessible as part of the scholarly record, but it will be clearly marked as “Retracted” to prevent readers from treating it as valid scholarly evidence.

4. Editorial Review

Before issuing a correction or retraction, the Editorial Board will assess the matter carefully and objectively.

Depending on the circumstances, the journal may:

  1. Request clarification or supporting documentation from the authors.
  2. Consult reviewers or subject experts.
  3. Contact the authors' institutions where appropriate.
  4. Seek additional independent advice.
  5. Publish a correction, expression of concern, or retraction.

The journal will make reasonable efforts to ensure that editorial actions are proportionate to the seriousness of the identified problem.

5. Expression of Concern

Where substantial concerns have been raised but a final determination cannot yet be made, EIP may publish an Expression of Concern.

An Expression of Concern serves to alert readers to potential problems while an investigation or assessment is ongoing.

Following further investigation, the journal may issue a correction, retraction, or other appropriate editorial notice.

6. Post-Publication Changes

EIP generally does not alter published articles without a formal editorial record.

Minor typographical or formatting errors that do not affect the scholarly meaning may be corrected without issuing a separate correction notice when appropriate.

Substantive changes affecting the scholarly content, interpretation, authorship, or integrity of the article will be documented transparently through an appropriate editorial notice.

7. Author Responsibility

Authors are expected to notify the Editorial Office promptly if they discover a significant error in their published article.

Authors should cooperate fully with the Editorial Board in investigating potential errors or ethical concerns and, where necessary, provide relevant information or documentation.

8. Editorial Integrity

All correction and retraction decisions are made independently of commercial considerations, payment of publication fees, institutional status, or other external interests.

EIP is committed to transparency, fairness, confidentiality, and due process in handling post-publication concerns.

The primary purpose of corrections and retractions is to protect the integrity of the scholarly record and ensure that readers have access to accurate and reliable academic information.