Eduistiqomah in Mathematics Education (EIME) accepts original scholarly manuscripts that fall within the journal's focus and scope. Manuscripts must present significant contributions to mathematics education research and should demonstrate originality, methodological rigor, clarity, and relevance to the field.
Authors are required to ensure that submitted manuscripts:
All authors are responsible for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of their submitted manuscripts.
EIME accepts the following types of manuscripts:
Reports of original empirical research using quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods, experimental, quasi-experimental, design-based, or other appropriate research approaches.
Systematic, scoping, critical, or integrative reviews that provide a substantial synthesis and critical evaluation of existing research in mathematics education.
Scholarly contributions that develop, critique, integrate, or extend theories and conceptual frameworks relevant to mathematics education.
Studies reporting the systematic development, validation, implementation, and evaluation of learning models, instructional materials, assessment instruments, educational technologies, or other innovations in mathematics education.
EIME accepts manuscripts written in English and Indonesian.
Authors are strongly encouraged to use clear, precise, academic, and internationally understandable language. Manuscripts written in English should be carefully proofread for grammar, terminology, coherence, and academic style before submission.
An original research article should generally contain the following sections:
The structure may be adjusted for review, theoretical, conceptual, or methodological manuscripts where appropriate.
The title should be:
The title should clearly communicate the principal research topic, population/context, or key variables where appropriate.
Authors should avoid overly broad, promotional, or ambiguous titles.
All authors must be listed accurately at the time of submission.
For each author, provide:
The corresponding author is responsible for communication with the editorial office and for ensuring that all authors have approved the submitted manuscript.
Changes to authorship after submission must be justified and approved by all authors and the editorial team.
The abstract should provide a concise summary of the study and should generally include:
The abstract should be written as a single coherent paragraph and should be sufficiently informative to allow readers to understand the study without referring to the full article.
Authors should avoid citations, unexplained abbreviations, tables, figures, and references within the abstract.
Provide 3–6 keywords that accurately represent the principal concepts of the manuscript.
Keywords should be specific and relevant to mathematics education and should avoid unnecessarily broad terms.
The Introduction should establish a clear academic rationale for the study. It should generally include:
Authors should critically engage with relevant and recent scholarly literature rather than merely providing a descriptive literature summary.
The Method section must provide sufficient information to allow readers to understand and, where appropriate, reproduce or evaluate the research process.
Depending on the research design, authors should clearly describe:
For quantitative studies, authors should provide appropriate information about variables, instruments, statistical procedures, assumptions, and analytical models.
For qualitative studies, authors should clearly explain the researcher's role, data sources, data collection, coding, analytical procedures, and strategies for establishing credibility and trustworthiness.
The Results section should present the findings objectively and systematically.
Authors should:
Tables and figures must be numbered consecutively and referred to in the manuscript text.
The Discussion should interpret the findings in relation to:
The Discussion should go beyond simply repeating the Results and should clearly explain the contribution of the study to mathematics education.
The Conclusion should provide a concise synthesis of the main findings and their significance.
Where appropriate, authors may also discuss:
The conclusion should be based directly on the findings presented in the manuscript.
Tables and figures should:
Authors must ensure that figures are of sufficient quality for publication and that all third-party materials are used in accordance with applicable copyright requirements.
Authors should cite relevant and credible scholarly sources.
EIME strongly encourages authors to:
Authors are encouraged to use reference management software such as Mendeley, Zotero, or EndNote.
The reference style specified by the journal template must be followed consistently.
Authors must comply with recognized ethical standards applicable to their research.
Where research involves human participants, authors should ensure that:
Authors should disclose any ethical considerations relevant to the study.
Submitted manuscripts must be original.
EIME uses plagiarism or similarity screening as part of the editorial process. Authors are responsible for properly acknowledging all sources and avoiding plagiarism, duplicate publication, self-plagiarism, fabrication, falsification, and other forms of research misconduct.
Manuscripts containing substantial unattributed or improperly reproduced material may be rejected or subject to further editorial action.
Authors may use artificial intelligence tools to assist with language improvement, grammar correction, translation, or other appropriate editorial tasks, provided that their use does not compromise the originality, accuracy, integrity, or accountability of the manuscript.
AI tools must not be listed as authors.
Authors remain fully responsible for:
The use of AI to generate or manipulate research data, results, citations, images, or other scholarly content must comply with applicable research and publication ethics.
Authors must disclose any financial, personal, institutional, or professional relationships that could reasonably be perceived as influencing the research or its publication.
If no conflict exists, authors should explicitly state:
“The authors declare no conflict of interest.”
Authors should disclose all sources of financial or institutional support for the research.
If the research received no specific funding, authors may state:
“This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.”
Authors are encouraged to provide information about the availability of research data, materials, instruments, or other resources supporting the findings.
Where data cannot be publicly shared because of ethical, privacy, legal, or institutional restrictions, authors should clearly explain the applicable restrictions.
For manuscripts with multiple authors, authors may be required to describe their individual contributions to the research and manuscript preparation.
All listed authors should have made a substantial contribution to the work and should approve the final version of the manuscript.
Authors retain the rights to their scholarly work in accordance with the journal's copyright and licensing policy.
Published articles are made available under the journal's stated Creative Commons license, allowing appropriate reuse with attribution.
Authors must ensure that permissions have been obtained for copyrighted material reproduced in the manuscript.
Before submitting a manuscript, authors should ensure that:
The manuscript falls within the focus and scope of EIME.
The manuscript is original and is not under consideration elsewhere.
All authors have approved the manuscript.
Author names and affiliations are complete and accurate.
ORCID iDs are provided where available.
The manuscript follows the EIME template.
The abstract and keywords are provided.
The research questions/objectives are clearly stated.
The methodology is sufficiently detailed.
Tables and figures are appropriately formatted.
References are complete and accurately cited.
DOI information has been checked where available.
Plagiarism/similarity requirements have been considered.
Ethical approval and informed consent are reported where applicable.
Conflict of interest is disclosed.
Funding information is provided where applicable.
Data availability information is provided where applicable.
AI use is disclosed where required.
The manuscript has been carefully proofread.
Authors are required to use the official EIME Manuscript Template when preparing their manuscripts.
The template provides guidance on:
Manuscripts that substantially fail to comply with the journal's formatting and submission requirements may be returned to the authors for technical revision before entering the peer-review process.
All submissions are initially evaluated by the editorial team to determine their relevance to the journal's scope, originality, basic methodological quality, ethical compliance, and adherence to submission requirements.
Manuscripts that pass the initial editorial screening are submitted to the journal's double-blind peer-review process.
The final publication decision is made by the editor based on the quality and relevance of the manuscript, reviewer recommendations, and the journal's editorial standards.
SUBMIT ARTICLE
ARTICLE TEMPLATE ENGLISH
ARTICLE TEMPLATE INDONESIA
CITEDNESS IN SCOPUS
Contact us
Tools
 |
 |
INFORMATION
